About
.Ok so what is this blog and why is it here? Well that’s the question isn’t it? Let me start with the “why” first.
- Reason 1: Because I’m a programming geek at heart and just wanted a playground to be able to write code whenever I felt the urge.
- Reason 2: To provide a place for free and open thought (see “What” below). Yeah, there’s plenty of those places already now, but I know several people who have a lot of good things to say and wanted to encourage them to share their thoughts in a more public place, not just in private conversations.
- Reason 3: I needed a new “start page” for my web browser.
OK What is it about? Well topically just about anything. It will probably be mostly faith, politics and culture though. It will definitely not be PC. It is my feeling that this prevailing idea today that everyone is “right” is ridiculous. The fact is that some ideas are right and some are wrong and others may fall somewhere in between. The key is to be respectful and humble when voicing them. I just read a great article in Christianity Today. It said the following.:
“Nobody with a beam in his eye can see things clearly. He is dangerously low on discernment. And, since we all have this distorted perspective, we need either to be very humble or else leave judging to God alone. We have a moral responsibility to judge the moral behavior of others—but only if we are humbly aware that we will sometimes be dead wrong and never totally right. We must remember that our ability to judge is limited and especially that we are sinful people who will ourselves, one day, come under judgment.”
With that understanding it is quite possible that someone may think an article posted here is “wrong” and post a comment saying so. Cool. Once again I’m going to squib some text from another blog, this time from The Ooze:
“We assume that some of our articles will directly contradict one another, and that’s okay. We want to provide a place where people can play with new ways of thinking and new ways of connecting with God. Actually, when it comes right down to it, many of these “new” ways are actually really “old” ways. We are finding that there are an abundance of resources that are rooted in the ancient traditions of the church that are overwhelmingly rich in heritage and present-day value. Many of these articles stem from Catholic and Orthodox viewpoints [ed. or Conservative, Liberal, Traditional, Emergent, etc] , and we are going out of our way to include them.â€
It’s in that spirit that Rev22.org will operate.
Enjoy!
Subscribe to Posts
Edward T. Babinski
says:
Added on October 30th, 2006 at 6:28 pmHello, ochristian,
Just wanted to let you know that I replied to the comments you left at the Debunking Christianity blog, i.e., concerning the topic, Non-Exclusivism, Universalism, Evil, and, Philosophy As One Big “IF” — an article dated Thursday, October 26, 2006.
http://debunkingchristianity.blogspot.com/2006/10/non-exclusivism-universalism-evil-and.html
I appreciate your calm tone.
Cheers,
Ed (hopeful agnostic, but not a believer in revelatory holy books) Babinski
ochristian
(blog author) says:
Added on November 3rd, 2006 at 5:41 pmThanks Ed, and thanks for visiting. I am still reading your comment and trying to get my mind around it. It just doesn’t seem to want to stretch like it used to.
ScriptureZealot
says:
Added on September 27th, 2007 at 3:53 pmYou said:
“The fact is that some ideas are right and some are wrong and others may fall somewhere in between.”
Some quotes of interest I’ve come across:
This puts us all in a place of humility before God. We must search the Scriptures, we must study God’s Word, we must wait on God. But because we are still in the evil Age, when we have done our best, we are compelled to say, “Lord, I have searched Thy Word; but I know only in part; I do not perfectly understand.†This lays a demand upon us that we hold the Word of God both in humility and in charity: in humility towards God and in charity towards our brethren.’
–George Ladd, Gospel of the Kingdom
I have not yet been able to stereotype my theological views, and have ceased to expect ever to do so. The idea is preposterous. None but an omniscient mind can continue to maintain a precise identity of view and opinions. Finite minds, unless they are asleep or stultified by prejudice, must advance in knowledge. The discovery of new truth will modify old views and opinions, and there is perhaps no end to this process with finite minds.
– Charles G. Finney
How these two sides of God’s truth—His sovereignty in choosing us (Rom. 9
) and our responsibility to confess and believe (Rom. 10
)—reconcile is impossible for us to understand fully. But Scripture declares both perspectives of salvation to be true (John 1:12-13
). It’s our duty to acknowledge both and joyfully accept them by faith.
–John MacArthur
tam
says:
Added on January 29th, 2008 at 12:15 amHey Buddy… I just wanted to thank you for encouraging us like you did over on Brents Bankruptcy post. Your friendship and support means a lot! Thank you!!
BuddyO
(blog author) says:
Added on January 29th, 2008 at 3:32 pmNo prob… I glad we got to know you guys…
Can’t wait for the ’surprise’!
Christian
says:
Added on March 31st, 2008 at 4:40 pmHey, Buddy. An East Coast blog gathering will be taking place this Saturday evening at 7:00 at the Ram’s Head in Savage. (Not too far, eh?) Ric Booth,Badguy,myself and hopefully you will be quaffing brews along with our brides. What say you? Here’s the link to the discussion:
http://ricbooth.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/walking-the-dog/#comments
tam
says:
Added on April 1st, 2008 at 10:11 amno fair!!! one day B and i are gonna get out there to see all you! have a drink for us too will ya?!!!