Paglia Postulates on Palin

I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I read a good article today by Camille Paglia, the self proclaimed liberal, atheist feminist. It’s a long article, but worth the read. Basically, she’s making the case that Sarah Palin is a powerful new force in the feminist movement… I actually agreed with much of what she had to say. Here’s a few choice snippets.

Camille Paglia

Conservative though she may be, I felt that Palin represented an explosion of a brand new style of muscular American feminism. … In terms of redefining the persona for female authority and leadership, Palin has made the biggest step forward in feminism since Madonna channeled the dominatrix persona of high-glam Marlene Dietrich and rammed pro-sex, pro-beauty feminism down the throats of the prissy, victim-mongering, philistine feminist establishment.

A feminism that cannot admire the bravura under high pressure of the first woman governor of a frontier state isn’t worth a warm bucket of spit.

My argument … has always been that nature has a master plan pushing every species toward procreation and that it is our right and even obligation as rational human beings to defy nature’s fascism. … Hence I have always frankly admitted that abortion is murder, the extermination of the powerless by the powerful. Liberals for the most part have shrunk from facing the ethical consequences of their embrace of abortion, which results in the annihilation of concrete individuals and not just clumps of insensate tissue.

Wow…! I have a lot of respect for her honesty even though I disagree. She agrees that abortion is the ‘extermination of the powerless by the powerful’ yet when weighed against a woman’s right to make choices about her own body feels that this extermination is justified. Hey, I feel the human right to life trumps a woman’s post-conception personal choice. (a woman responsibility to choose exists in the decision making which takes place before conception in the form of abstinence or birth control)

I have never understood the standard Democratic combo of support for abortion and yet opposition to the death penalty. Surely it is the guilty rather than the innocent who deserve execution?

That one I thought was extremely interesting. I never understood how conservatives could stand for the sanctity of life for the unborn, and still be supportive of the death penalty. Either we believe life is sacred or we don’t… I do…  It never occurred to me that pro-choice Democrats face the same paradox from the other perspective.

And it is equally foolish to expect that feminism must for all time be inextricably wed to the pro-choice agenda. There is plenty of room in modern thought for a pro-life feminism — one in fact that would have far more appeal to third-world cultures where motherhood is still honored and where the Western model of the hard-driving, self-absorbed career woman is less admired.

Right on Sista!

 

18 replies


  1. Roar of approval. I’m so glad to see Paglia using her powers for good …

    Kate Dinos last blog post..On The Eighth Day


  2. Welcome Kate!

    Interesting blog… I’ll have to peruse a bit.

    I certainly have never been a fan of Paglia, but I always have respect for folks who reasoned and thoughtful.


  3. Good stuff. I’ve liked a lot stuff she has written, although I know them mostly as sound bites. I think both the Left and the Right think she is one of “theirs’ which is pretty cool. She apparently takes stands that are in opposition to the majority factions. It always annoyed the hell out of me that when I was a conservative I had to be against environmentalism or gay rights. Or if I was a liberal I had to endorse Keynesian economics and be opposed to our incursions in Iraq. Hogwash.

    Here is a quote of hers that one of the few ’straight’ male ballet dancers I ever met once gave me:

    “Heaven help the American-born boy with a talent for ballet.”

    Christian Beyers last blog post..My Son Ian Joins the Marines


  4. Ehhhh…

    Brand new style of muscular American feminism and not only that, since Madonna? Quite a claim.

    Haha not too much fair and balanced discussion from me on Palin since I detest the woman. I do agree about the paradox thing so I will give her that :-)


  5. Detest? That’s a strong word for someone you disagree with. Or have you met? You remind me of those folks who detest Hillary and Obama. Or the ones who maligned Andrew Jackson’s wife’s good looks (or lack there of).

    I didn’t agree with Bill Clinton on much of anything. I’ll bet it would have been fun to share a beer with him though. I’d rather go camping with him than Carter or GWB. ;)


  6. Hey, Tara. Didn’t mean for that to ’sound’ so snippy. Just joshing you. :)

    Christian Beyers last blog post..Mother Yes, Pastor No, President Maybe


  7. I thought the same thing… wow, how can you detest someone you’ve never met. I’m no fan of Obama, but it would be hard for me to say I detest him, I just don’t want to be subjected to his brand of Socialism.

    Regardless of what you think of her politics, she has indeed added to the face of feminism. For me ‘feminism’ has always carried a negative connotation. I think Palin broadens what it means to be a strong, independent woman. I would prefer my daughter use her as a role model (she already does) than some other more stereotypical feminists from the NOW mold.

    edit
    BTW: Here’s an example of someone who detests Sarah Palin… I’m sure you don’t want to be grouped in with her… real nice…


  8. Tara, a question.. just curious to your thoughts.

    Do you feel that a feminist, or a strong woman leader, needs to conform to a litmus test of ideology? Or can she be an independent thinker, conservative, liberal, libertarian, green party, executive, stay at home mom, missionary, CEO?

    Or do you only recognize as ‘feminist’ strong women that share a particular set of values?


  9. Buddy,
    My definition of a feminist is someone who believes in equal rights, under the law, for women. Earlier feminists campaigned for rights to inherit, to own property, to vote. Then they campaigned for other equal provisiions of the law nand for the right to work in some occupations that were traditionally men-only jobs. Today they are campaigning for equal pay for equal work and to break the ‘glass ceiling’ in government and business circles.

    By this definition, I consider myself a feminist and I suspect you are, too. Title IX is a result of the feminist movement and one of the reasons the USA did so well in Bejing–especially in womens team sports. When my kids were growing up, my son had community football, basketball, etc. My daughters had nothing. Today, due to Title IX, girls have community soccer, basketball, softball, etc.

    I am a feminist even though I did not choose to support EITHER of the prominent female candidates this year. Equal rights does not mean preference.


  10. Agreed. I just find it curious why the prominent feminist figureheads openly reject Sarah Palin as a feminist. Tara’s reaction is common. It would seem as though there’s no room for a woman who is a pro-life, proud mom, Christian, Conservative among their ranks.

    I find it interesting that the women I respect most, the ones I admire for their strength, courage, integrity and wisdom are all diametrically opposite of Gloria Stienem, Barbara Streisand, Hillary Clinton and Michele Obama. I can respect those women as powerful, influential women (except maybe Babs..) but they certainly don’t represent the totality of what it means to be a feminist as they might have you believe… and I DEFINITELY would not encourage my daughter to use any of them as a role model (especially not Babs).


  11. I’m really not sure what you have against Michele. I can see how the others might rub you the wrong way. The feminists of old–some of them, at least–were militant. They had to be to get people to take them seriously. They had to shock and then shame people. While they did have men supporting their cause, they needed a whole lot more before they could get the changes they sought. Gloria and Babs are like that. I always felt Hillary wanted to help Hillary a lot more than she wanted to help women’s equality. However, if she could USE the support of the feminist movement, she was glad to do so. As for Sarah, I’m not sure she is for the women’s movement either. She seems to me to be for Sarah and if anyone crosses her, well she will just cut him off at the knees. ‘Least that’s what I hear from Alaska. I wouldn’t suggest her for a role model either.


  12. Well it all goes to how you disseminate all of the bias media (left and right) since I don’t know any of these people personally. Every bit of information you read has some sort of slant, including that email you sent about Palin.

    Re Michelle, after parsing media from all perspectives I’m left with a picture of a bitter, angry, extremist with strong ties to some very nasty radicals.

    Re Palin, I’ve seen a bunch of letters and reports describing her as an authentic, honest person. Her approval rating, I think, speaks to that. Certainly there is evidence that she doesn’t put up with people crossing her. Perhaps there could have been better ways to handle those situations. The truth about her personality lies in the totality of all reports.

    Now a role model… how about Cindy McCain. Now there’s someone who has devoted their life to the benefit of others. What ever one thinks about her husband, you can’t deny she’s an awesome woman. Not a perfect life, but who’s is?


  13. She seems to me to be for Sarah and if anyone crosses her, well she will just cut him off at the knees

    And your point, Bill? She sounds like a woman who is making it in a man’s world, like most politicians, Left or Right, and most business people. Isn’t that the goal of militant feminism?

    As far as the glass ceiling goes – it’s a myth. Taken as a percentage of those in the work force, there are more women CEO’s and more women business owners than men. And when you factor in the time that women have taken off to raise families they actually earn more on average than men do. And it only makes sense, because business’s main focus is profitability and on average women are more productive, more dependable and more loyal in the workplace (they show up more often on Monday mornings.)The bottom line cares nothing for gender.

    Christian Beyers last blog post..There Oughta Be a Law


  14. I’m not crazy about ‘role models’ or for hero worship. Sure there are some very laudable things about McCain, Obama, Palin, Biden, etc. But for every strong point there is a corresponding weak one. We may not know what they are. McCain has surely done some heroic things but that is not a reason to vote for him. Walter Mondale was bomber pilot in the same war that Bush Sr. and Dole flew planes and Kennedy drove boats.

    Many great men and women were lousy husbands, wives and parents. Some were rude to their neighbors and others drove their employees or soldiers to death. Some owned slaves. I think it was Spurgeon’s (sorry if it was another famous preacher) wife who said that he loved God so much he neglected his own marriage, even though he preached on the virtues of a ‘godly’ marriage.

    I like what a female comic once said about heroes. She said that she had little use for the action hero type or the romantic leading man. She said that a real hero is someone who can come home from work to the same wife and kids everyday while staring a 30 year mortgage in the face. Of course the same thing can be said of women heroes.

    Christian Beyers last blog post..There Oughta Be a Law


  15. Aww man, it’s like November and I’m just checking your blog :-(

    I absolutely HATED most of my women’s studies at UMBC, mainly because of the professors and the stupid curriculum, so I understand why people don’t dig feminism. I was always more attracted to race and poverty issues than I was for gender issues, but I don’t think feminism should get as bad as a rap as it does.

    Just like Afrocentrism, Eurocentrism, etc… feminism or womanism is just the study of the world from a woman’s perspective. I think women have different and unique perspectives on the world, but unfortunately throughout history their voices were often silenced, so there has now been a resurgence of interest in history, politics, education, you name it from womens’ perspectives. I’m sure Women’s Studies classes at Harvard are far better than UMBC’s, but that’s another post.

    The conservative woman’s viewpoint should be heard and represented more in the feminist/women’s studies realm, but they are often left out.

    Okay, okay, maybe I should have said that I detest her viewpoints, just like I detest Hilary’s viewpoints on many things. I wouldn’t mind going camping with her at all…maybe she could teach me how to roast a mooseburger over the fire. But as a politician and leader of the people I have virtually no respect for her. No street cred with me there. Sarah Palin certainly has a role in feminist/womanist history though.

    ~Tara


  16. Dot’s taking a course on the history of European women and says it is very dull. I said, what do you expect? How many interesting things can you say about butter churning, thread spinning, quilting bees and baby making?

    Can you believe she struck her own father?


  17. Nice Chris…

    Honestly, I wish after all the breakthroughs in this election we could finally start to be done with all the ‘isms’. Including feminism, racism, socialism, conservatism, liberalism…

    I’m particularly done with Democrat-ism and Republican-ism… toss ‘em all out and lets start again…

    The sooner we get to just ‘people’ the better.


  18. No way. I don’t trust the ‘people’.

Leave a reply

Rev22: Whoever Is Thirsty, Let Him Come is using WP-Gravatar